Thursday, October 30, 2008

Man Fashion: Tom Ford With Moore and Firth

Tom Ford is finally going public with his movie plans.

As I told you earlier in my blog, the fashion prince will make his directorial debut with a movie adaptation of Christopher Isherwood’s 1964 novel, A Single Man.

Colin Firth will star as a gay college professor who is dealing with the death of his longtime lover. Julianne Moore costars as a lifelong friend of the professor’s.

While early talk was Jamie Bell would play one of his students, it turns that role has gone to Matthew Goode.


The story takes place in 1962 in Los Angeles. Filming will begin in L.A. on Nov. 3.

Ford spoke publicly about wanting to get behind the camera when he left Gucci in 2004. He acquired movie right's to A Single Man about a year ago.

He also started his own men's fashion line last year with stores in New York, Las Vegas, Dubai, Los Angles and Moscow, among many others.

Source: eonline.com


Technorati Tags: , ,

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

The Last Republican President

While most Americans who live in the lower 90-percentile have had hellish lives over the past decade, we may actually owe President George W. Bush, VP Dick Cheney and evil-genius Karl Rove a debt of gratitude when it’s all over with. No, we’re not safer than we were before the Bush era, nor are we better off as our economy is in shambles.

Actually the Democrats and anyone else for that matter seemed feckless in stopping this Greedy Old Party’s megalomania juggernaut. It turns out they imploded under the weight of their own excess.

Oh they’re still giving the old slash-and-burn, pull-out-all-the-stops campaign blitz one last run-through, hoping for that miracle knockout that won’t happen. What’s really been fascinating is watching how the GOPers deconstructed right before our very eyes from top to bottom.

“It's something unpredictable, but in the end it's right.
I hope you had the time of your life.” — Good Riddance, Green Day


It speaks volumes when the GOP is on the threshold of a presidential election; everyone is running away from their incumbent president as fast as they can, and subtly easing away from their current nominee for president in preparation of the train wreck ahead. It also says something when the only two “rock stars” on the campaign trail are two individuals with no national, much less international, experience: Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber.

"Sarah Oh-Twelve!" bellowed a man in field coat and jeans, one of several thousand at the Leesburg VA rally, when Palin spoke about her tax policies recently. The same news story noted there were "I [Heart] Palin" bumper stickers on cars, "Team Sarah" T-shirts in pink, "Sarah!" pins and countless signs: "You Go Girl." "You're in Palin Country." "Maverick Barracuda." One of the souvenir vendors said his most popular offering was a pin showing Palin next to a pit bull and the usual "McCain-Palin" logo reversed, with her name first and in larger letters.

So much for running mate. That mavericky Pit Bull Barracuda Palin has effectively emasculated the John McCain campaign. She is number one. True to form, she also runs closer to the Bush model of rule and philosophy – despite trying to awkwardly paint herself in maverick’s colors. This inspires the base more than an unpredictable maverick McCain.

Meanwhile Samuel "Joe the Plumber'' Wurzelbacher has been on the second most popular presidential campaign tour. He’s become a rock star in his own right for playing the part of the ringer in his “spontaneous independent” fifteen minutes of news fame – which he’s parlaying into a full-time political career. At this point, anyone pretending to be a devoted mouthpiece for the salacious neo-con base is practically guaranteed a nomination for whatever office they can affix their ambition to. (e.g. Katherine Harris of Florida Secretary of State fame)

Even Joe’s mavericking on his own as he recently sidestepped the economic message that his "Joe the Plumber Tour'' was designed for when he endorsed a statement made by a member of the audience in Columbus that "a vote for Obama is a vote to the death of Israel.''

"I agree with you,'' Joe said. "I really think that would be a problem.'' McCain campaign operatives later came back and retracted that message from he who hopes to be Ohio’s newest congressman.

Wurzelbacher also said Tuesday he's considering a lawsuit over the fact that government workers have apparently searched some records pertaining to him since he challenged Barack Obama on his tax policy two weeks ago.

"I have contacted a lawyer,'' he said as he formally hit the political stump. "I'd like to see justice done. That's just for other people who dare ask their elected officials a question. They shouldn't have to go through the scrutiny that I've gone through. It shouldn't have to bother their families the way it's bothered my family.''

Apparently someone forgot to tell Joe The Plumber that we live under the rule of the Patriot Act. Government can look into anything they want to, whenever they want to as part of protecting America in the midst of this war on terror. He can be jailed (detained) indefinitely if they deem him a threat to the president or the country’s security. And no, Joe, it’s not some commie-liberal plot against hard-working, middle-class, $250k per year stiffs like you … it was rock-ribbed conservatives like George W. Bush and Dick “I have unitary executive powers, too” Cheney who escorted this into law.

But then why would Joe the Plumber care about that? Or Pit Bull Sarahcuda Palin for that matter? People don’t need to be familiar with the laws of the land or world events or geopolitics either. Geography’s for wimps! Hah!

All that’s needed is raw, unending ambition and the stamina to do whatever it takes to be a loyal party-devoted conduit for the neo-conservative message.

Meanwhile the party’s business and brain-trust conservatives trash Palin, the neos ridicule the neutered McCain, all sides are fervently looking for a place to bury the rotting corpse of Bush-Cheney politics and lamenting the death of Reagan’s supply-side, total deregulation as we see our economy collapse around our avaricious ears. Eventually our two-party system will fall apart and the GOP will be the first to divide.

But right now, the only attention being paid to the GOP in any active sense is focusing on who may well be the two new standard bearers for the remnants of it: Pit Bull Barracuda and Joe The Plumber. Somewhere, someone is printing up campaign 2012 stickers and T-shirts emblazoned with “Palin / Wurzelbacher.” Great news for the blind devotees in neo-con land. Bad news for anyone wishing to see a Republican in the White House any time soon.

George W. Bush may well be the last Republican president in America. Good riddance ….

“Another turning point, a fork stuck in the road.
Time grabs you by the wrist, directs you where to go.
So make the best of this test, and don't ask why.
It's not a question, but a lesson learned in time.” — Good Riddance, Green Day

Man Fashion: Casual Business Clothing

Presentation is everything when it comes to business clothing, As everyone should know the first impression is almost important. Hence, right business clothing, be traditional, casual classic, or smart casual can actually help a person's level of confident and chance of being successful too. Therefore, working business men are always in search for ways to differentiate themselves from their peers, and what better way to do it than to look different?

Unless you are in the fashion industry, dressing too faddishly will have your bosses wondering if you are more concerned with your wardrobe than your job. So instead of formal business attire, most of the men moved to Casual Business Clothing.

Three Level of Business Clothing


The new business casual look evolved as Silicon Valley opened up the world to young entrepreneurs and a more relaxed way of doing business. Casual business clothing comes to three basic levels: classic, smart and relaxed.


Classic


Traditional business and Classic casual business clothing is elegant. These two level of business dress call for an elegant, clean finish to your look.

Traditional business wear consists of a suit, shirt and tie. It is the most formal of business attire. The suit is made of well constructed suiting. The suit jacket should always be buttoned up, except when sitting perhaps.


Casual business classic is a small step down from traditional. It works best when you want to create an overall impression of professionalism, authority, dependability. The jacket is the key in casual business classic fashion. But bear in mind that it should not match your trousers, as that will dress it up to the traditional level.

This casual business classic clothing style is most suitable if your business is based in outdoor lifestyles and products.

Casual Business Smart Style

Casual business smart works best when you want to create an overall impression of accessibility, friendliness, competence, creativity.

So for this look, you only need a neat trousers and a shirt. If you happen to have a jacket with you, remember to loosen the jacket to create the dress down effect.


Casual Business Relaxed Style

Casual business relaxed look are most welcome on end of the week, ie. Friday. The key item is denim. This is the most relaxed form of dressing and should only be worn when you are definitely not expecting to meet any clients. However, Casual Business Relaxed Clothing are also well received by technology group of people working in Silicon Valley.




Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Man Designer Fashion Accessories Essentials

When we talk about Man Designer Fashion Accessories, items that come to my mind are fashion designer tie, fashion designer sunglasses, fashion designer watch, handkerchief, designer shoes, fashion designer wallets, sandals, cellphone, mp3 etc. There are plenty of brands from Man Fashion Designers out there. You can find some designer fashion accessories are expensive and some are affordable. More importantly, what are the most essentials a man should look out for when come to designer fashion accessories.


Designer Fashion Essential 1 - Never Substitute Quantity for Quality
Buying in bulk can leave you looking as if you have a lots of cheap pieces at your wardrobe. But when come to man designer fashion, it is the quality that count. Hence, choose your designer fashion accessories wisely, they are your assets in your future.


Designer Fashion Essential 2 - Organize Your Wardrobe
Trousers, suits at one side, and fashion accessories at the other side etc. It will make finding the correct combination so much easier.


Designer Fashion Essential 3 - Always Feel Confident in What You Wear
As I always said, if you leave your house with second thoughts on what are you wearing on that day, it is most probably you got the wrong combination.


Designer Fashion Essential 4 - Do the "Blink" Test
Stand in fornt of a full length mirror, Look at yourself quickly and see what image you have given to yourself. Do all of these fashion accessories work together with your clothes? Likewise, always test this out when you decide to buy something at the outlets. I always think women are more smarter than men when come to this.


Designer Fashion Essential 5 - Ensure Your Fashion Designer Accessories are appropriate to the occasion
Most of the time we do mess the accessories and the locations or occasion up. So if possible, check with the organizers before you attend any functions or party.


Designer Fashion Essential 6 - Don't leave home without a Handkerchief
I am sure most of the younger don't has this habit. As everyone is now more and more aware and concern about environment around us. It is always a good practice to carry handkerchief rather than paper tissues, you play your part and the rest will take care of it.

Lastly, you can always add more colours and designs to all your accessories, so you will not out of fashion and colour to match, be it formal or casual wear.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

The Parallel Worlds Of Modern America


As I was up in Boston for the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Gala protest last week (thus my silence on the blog lately). After the event, I went home with Ethan St. Pierre and his wife Karen and chatted on a number of things, straying from the topic of GLBT politics.

My friends Ethan and Karen expressed how fondly they recalled the economy of the 1980's. They both noted their union jobs, Karen making $55K per year, Ethan making $65K per year -- and even living at home with his mom (well before either of their transitions, meaning Ethan was doing this as a born female). Ethan noted his fully covered health insurance and his $5.97 a month union dues!

The stark disparity for Ethan and Karen from twenty plus years ago to today is enormous.

However, to say I was personally astonished with their story would be understatement of the year! In Texas and throughout the south, only those fortunate enough to be roughnecks on the oil rigs made that level of money, unless they were in an executive or professional position. And even with that, once the Oil Bust occurred in late 1985, even oil jobs evaporated, with degreed geologists even being a dime-a-dozen. As a computer operator at that same time, I was making $5.91 an hour with limited health benefits, never cracking the $20K threshold until 1990 and even today never coming close to even Karen's income levels, much less Ethan's!

The 80's were economically brutal, and not just for the gulf coast (or the chemical coast as it was tagged). Texas saw waves of "black tag" migrants, named for the most predominant state -- Michigan -- whose license plates black with white lettering. It was inaccurately affixed to Michigan alone, though. We saw waves of folks from Indiana, Iowa, Ohio and throughout the region, living out of cars or in tent cities under freeway underpasses just outside of the metro areas in Texas, or if fortunate enough, living in flophouse-styled boarding houses like the Animal House where I happened to stay during a period in 1982 as Reaganomics was bludgeoning Texas as well.

Every state in the Midwest, in rural America and throughout the south enjoyed double digit unemployment. In Texas, foreclosures created near ghost towns in some of the newer subdivisions and apartment-laden areas during the initial bust and subsequent Savings & Loan meltdown. I always wondered how Pres. Ronald Reagan had the gall to speak to the nation about the "greatest economy" and "lowest unemployment" the nation had ever seen! We all presumed there were pockets of America somewhere things were going well, obviously so. Yet we had no idea where they were. It was more remote or legendary rather than real.

Clearly we were parallel worlds, unaware (or barely aware) of the others' existence. It intrigued me that we could have these parallels with so little knowledge of what was on the other side. And certainly the parallels are applicable throughout other aspects of society.

It was fitting symbolism for what we had just finished protesting: an HRC Banquet populated by economically-superior beings, with little more than a passing awareness of us outside -- the transgendered, the radical faeries, the ethnic minority and disenfranchised portions of gays and lesbians, the youth. Certainly on the trans level, with not only the economic challenges but also the attendant medical necessities, they are virtually clueless. What few trans people they will choose for us as our leaders have none of the sense of urgency, desperation, or perpetual fear from either a physical or financial sense. We're aware of each other, but exist in separate, parallel universes where the experiential twains never meet.

Even the HRC logo fits this parallel culture: an equal sign, with one line above, one below, the twain never meeting. I wonder if there was any thought of how classic of an icon they would create for themselves, communicating both an equal sign and a classist separation in the same symbol? It's strategically brilliant marketing.

The HRC Equal icon is the perfect symbol of an entitlement, and indeed they seek out those segments of society almost exclusively. Typically the only non-elite they bring in are those whose personal stories are good enough to be fundraised upon. It's this structure that completely freezes out the majority of their own community, as well as all of the ancillary subcultures they market themselves as supporting.

While we're each only externally able to appraise each other, I'm sure we of the excluded class only partially are aware of the lifestyle and opportunities of those who've attained personal equality. Conversely there's been no desire or need to know, much less get a concrete sense of the experience of those of us in society's perpetual underclass.

While we can communicate, there is a net negative for those who've "made it" to experience or address disparity as it involves either reducing their stand, or lifting the unfortunate. The elite won't give up what they've already got. Elite is by definition, the few, the special, something more exclusive based upon their ability to succeed. But keep in mind that success is more than simply ability. It is more relevantly opportunity as well; and the two should not be conflated. Some have abundant opportunity with lesser ability and can still be successful – to wit: George W. Bush. Others have abundant ability, but none of the opportunity.


It's the absence of opportunity that will keep a wall between the haves and have-nots, the HRC's of the world and the protesting "tranny trash" for quite likely generations to come. Thus you will see the protests and battles for many years to come. We're happy for the gay community, that they've attained success and happiness for theirs. Absent that same opportunity or hope, transgenders will never be content for ourselves.

We live in different, parallel worlds. And so it goes ....


"Hope will never be silent." — Harvey Milk

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Man Fashion: Y-3 Collection

Today, I am going to introduce this to you, in fact is not so new after all, but has been well received by younger generation lately. So what am I talking about? Yes, Y-3.


Y-3 is the highly exclusive collaborative project between Adidas and cult Japanese designer, Yohji Yamamoto. The meaning of the name is clear to see; the Y standing for Yamamoto and the 3 being the famous three stripes of Adidas Y3


Allegedly influenced by the all-encompassing image of Y3 Adidas`s three stripe logo adorning Tokyo kids, Yamamoto y3 chose to integrate their logo into clothes. This led to the clothing, footwear and accessories collections by Y3.



This differed from other collaborations because the collection was designed from scratch rather than changing existing designs, giving Yamamoto total creative freedom to create the Y3 COLLECTIONS.



Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Man Fashion: Must Have Timepiece - ToyWatch

If you are thinking this is Toy's Watch, I bet you make a big mistake. ToyWatch has been well received by celebrity communities in recent years, and it become the must have timepiece to have in most of men and women wrist. Most important, this brand actually give you the celebrity style as well as affordable price.




In the fall of 2006, Milan-based designer and wristwatch aficionado Marco Mavilla designed the first ToyWatch. A lightweight, oversized plastic watch, inspired by high design timepieces, ToyWatch is unexpected, arresting and irreverent. Under the direction of fine-watch collector and ToyWatch USA CEO, Randy Gordon, ToyWatch was brought to the USA in the summer of 2006.




ToyWatch has become the "it" wristwatch and the "must-have" item among style influentials and tastemakers, supporters include Robbie Williams, Michael Jordan, Jack Osborne, Johnny Knoxsville, Clive Owen, Madonna, Naomi Campbell, Lindsey Lohan, Jessica Simpson, Uma Thurman, Sienna Miller, Paris Hilton... the list goes on!



What distinguishes ToyWatch from the '80s phenomenon is the resulting aesthetic. The bezeled edges and chronographs might be made mostly of plastic, but they have the sophisticated approach of a Rolex.

Find out more from the official website.


Technorati Tags: , , ,

Monday, October 20, 2008

Man Fashion: Why Man Cheat?

Dear readers, I just came across this interesting survey, and thought of sharing with all of you here as well as listen to your comments.

What makes men cheat? Marriage counselor M. Gary Neuman surveyed 200 cheating and non cheating husbands to get at the real reasons behind men's infidelity. So here are some of his findings. Let see whether you do agree on these points.

1. 48% of men rated emotional dissatisfaction as the primary reason they cheated.
So much for the myth that for men, cheating is all about physical intimacy. According to the author: "But men are emotionally driven beings too. They want their women to show them that they're appreciated, and they want women to understand how hard they're trying to get things right." The problem is that men are less likely than women to express these feelings, so you won't always know when your guy is in need of a little affirmation. "Most men consider it unmanly to ask for a pat on the back, which is why their emotional needs are often overlooked," Neuman says.

2.
66% of cheating men report feeling guilt during the affair.
Clearly, guilt isn't enough to stop a man from cheating. "Men are good at compartmentalizing feelings," Neuman explains. "They can hold on to their emotions and deal with them later." So even if your partner swears he would never cheat, don't assume it can't happen. It's important for both of you to take steps toward creating the relationship you want.

3. 77% of cheating men have a good friend who cheated.
Hanging around friends who stray makes cheating seem normal and legitimizes it as a possibility. The message he's subconsciously telling himself: "My friend is a good guy who happens to be cheating on his wife. I guess even the best of us do it." Hey, I just wonder is this the reason?

4. 40% of cheating men met the other woman at work.
"Oftentimes the woman he cheats with at the office is someone who praises him, looks up to him, and compliments his efforts," Neuman says.

5. Only 12% of cheating men said their mistress was more physically attractive than their wife.
n other words, a man doesn't stray because he thinks he'll get lucky with a better-looking body.

6. 73%
of cheating men had physical intimacy with a woman after meeting her more than a month.

Source:
Hearst Communications, Inc


Sunday, October 19, 2008

Men Fashion: Tuxedo Essentials

by Melanie Bernds

Tuxedo Essentials: Master the final points of Formal Wear
A Brief History
Contrary to common belief, colorful tuxedos were not an invention of the 1970's and 1980's. In fact, brightly colored formal wear was the rule in the courts of England until the early 1800's when a certain Beau Brummell appeared at a formal function in black and white. While Mr. Brummell caused quite a stir, he also began a fashion trend that has yet to die.


A second major transformation in formal wear occurred in the 1890's in Tuxedo Park, New York, when tobacco tycoon Griswold Lorillard appeared at the Tuxedo Park Ball in a black version of the English smoking jacket. Until that time, black coat tails and a white bow tie had been the tradition. Like Brummell, Lorillard caused quite a stir and started a trend that continues. He was also influential in naming this new outfit the "tuxedo", after the city in which it debuted.


Though colorful tuxedos can be seen in the windows of many formal wear stores, the most widely worn selection is the black tuxedo. The jacket may be single or double-breasted with notched, peaked or shawl lapels. Tuxedo pants traditionally have a strip of satin or grosgrain running down the outer seam of the leg.


Dress shirts may be constructed of fine broadcloth or voile. They are generally white with subtle front pleats, French cuffs, and a wing or turned-down collar. Traditional bow ties are black satin or grosgrain, though brightly colored and patterned bow ties are very popular today.


Essential Accessories
A waistcoat OR a cummerbund should be worn with a tuxedo, but never both. Waistcoats are formal vests, usually made out of a contrasting silk or matching wool. Cummerbunds are worn around the waist, attaching in the back with a small clasp. A cummerbund should match the bow tie. Tradition calls for cummerbunds to be worn with the pleats facing up. (The folds of a cummerbund were once used for storing theater tickets.)


"Tuxedo shoes" are best characterized as lightweight, black, and free of ornamentation. They are traditionally patent leather pumps or seamless lace-ups. They should be worn with lightweight black stockings.

Levels of Distinction: White Tie vs. Black Tie
It is important to note that there are several levels of formal dress, the two most formal being "black tie" and "white tie."


For a black tie social function, appropriate attire consists of a black tuxedo and dress pants, a white dress shirt with turned-down collar, a black or patterned bow tie and cummerbund, black formal socks, and plain black or patent leather oxford shoes.


For a white tie event, nothing less than full dress attire will do. White tie is the most formal of formal wear and includes silk-face black coat tails and dress trousers, white pique dress waistcoat and matching bow tie, white pleated dress shirt with wing collar and French cuffs, formal socks, patent leather shoes, and pearl cuff links or studs. The look is completed with a dark overcoat, white gloves and scarf, and an opera hat.



Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Man Fashion: Untitled Innovative Fashion

Mens fashion and style interests men more today than ever, as they realize that looking good is an asset in every aspect of their lives: Business, personal or, social.


The fact is, youngsters are now moving into more innovative fashion and style which will give them unique personality and impression. As we always said "personality may be great but first impressions count."



Bought by Asos.com, ‘Untitled' is the innovative new menswear project initiated Developed from the idea that limited edition products captivate men, ‘Untitled’ invites experts in denim, vinyl, trainers, sunglasses and new designers, to collate, and then offer to asos.com, a series of rare, hard to find or limited edition products for sale. The project propels menswear forward on asos.com and highlights some of the current creativity in men’s fashion and lifestyle products.




Technorati Tags:, , , ,

Friday, October 17, 2008

Wealth Redistribution - The GOP Battle Cry

"Nobody should be excused from paying income taxes" — Ari Fleischer, former press secretary for George W. Bush

A few night back I watched the Daily Show with Jon Stewart, whose guest was Ari Fleischer. Personally, Fleischer had always struck me as arrogant, but I learned he's got a selfish streak in him that rivals the arrogance. Asked on his thoughts Barack Obama, he came out blasting Obama's tax plan as favoring the working poor. "You can't have a country that is going to be strong if you have about 45% of the country that is excused from paying income tax."

As elaborated in the opening quote as his thoughts about tax breaks to the middle class, Fleischer is mirroring what we've heard from McCain and Palin in debates recently. Bottom line, helping out any of the lower 90's who've suffered over the past eight years is wrong, according to the GOP. Just like four years ago, it's "compassionate conservativism" ... also known as "tough love."

And the amazing irony of this is it follows so soon after the taxpayers (all of us!) had to pony up bail for Wall Street. Usually these conservatives allow a bit more time between incidents for we ephemerally-memoried LCD's out in TV land to put it out of mind before beginning the act of switching the bait.

But lo, this year's GOPers have heard an earful from the "wealthy elite" of "Wall Street" who've been the whipping boy of both political parties. The vice presidential debate showed Sarah Palin's response to Joe Biden's populism making the comment that she had concerns "about this wealth redistribution" idea based upon Obama's plans for adddressing this failed economy.

During last week's final debate, we saw John McCain doing likewise with his "Joe the Plumber" sock puppet act, where he brought up how a middle class guy like Joe who theoretically earns a little over $250,000 a year could end up seeing his tax burden go up. Heinous. The caveat is this: when you make $250,000 annually, you are in the upper 1% of the country, income-wise. When was it that those in the lower reaches of the upper 1% became middle class?

This of course overlooks the point that the whole Joe The Plumber routine was a red herring. Joe wasn't an independent (he's registered Republican), doesn't make close to a quarter million salary -- and wouldn't even if his company's profit was just over that range anyway (there would be deductible costs and labor expense), and is not a licensed plumber anyway (not a requirement for an individual plumber in Ohio, but strange when you consider he wanted to buy a plumbing contracting business!).

It does demonstrate how great of lengths the GOP (aka: the Greedy Old Party) will go to protect their base -- or as George W. Bush put it, "the haves and have-mores."

What is most galling is how brazen the GOPers deceit is in this election season, painting themselves as being the middle class everyman, and attempting to play Barack Obama as representing elite! Yet it's Mr. "Everyman" McCain who's concerned about doing anything that infringes upon the upper one-percenters net income, and Mr. "Elite" Obama being the one proposing assistance to the lower 95% of America.

To that end, we saw John McCain's most recent comments on the stump speech trail have painted Obama's tax plan as giving "welfare" checks to the most economically impacted in America. "Raising taxes on some in order to give checks to others is not a tax cut; it's just another government giveaway."

This "giveaway" complaint comes mere weeks after McCain himself gave active support and voted for his conservative President's plan to offer a $700 billion bailout of Wall Street banks. Even now we're discovering from the UK's Guardian a report that the major banks benefitting from this new "nationalizing" act will be giving an estimated $70 billion in total pay compensation to their staffs, with some banks' total employee compensation to date exceeding the entire stock value.

No welfare state there, eh?

"John McCain is so out of touch with the struggles you are facing that he must be the first politician in history to call a tax cut for working people 'welfare,'" Barack Obama responded in his speech under the St. Louis arch. "The only 'welfare' in this campaign is John McCain's plan to give another $200 billion in tax cuts to the wealthiest corporations in America."

Touche, Obama.

Folks, there's going to be plenty of baseless claims this campaign season. Get smart, look this stuff up for yourself! Find out who is truly the candidate standing for the majority of this country that has been screaming in pain, unheard mostly throughout these past years. It's not the man with more houses than he can account for, claiming to be the everyman looking out for the middle class and calling middle class tax cuts as welfare!

"Don't believe the hype - its a sequel
As an equal, can I get this through to you?" — Don't Believe the Hype, Public Enemy

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Was "Joe The Plumber" A Republican Plant?

“As I trudge the path of destiny my opinion doesn't pay,
I'm a blue collar simple mind who cannot find his way his way.” — Regular Guy, the Dropkick Murphys


Much of last night’s debate raged around the seemingly mythical “Joe The Plumber,” and how Barack Obama and John McCain’s policies were going to affect “regular Joes” like him. With the economy tanking this badly and most of America feeling stiffed by this myth of the “American Dream”, it stood to reason that the candidates would try to conjure a quintessential image of someone from middle America, trying to make up his mind who to vote for in this crucial election year.

Joe seemed to personify this modern-American everyman, one who both ambivalent voters and press, hungry for “realism” away from the too-scripted political processes looked to for help making sense of what everyone was seeing.

As it turns out, this “Joe the Plumber” was a real person: Joe Wurzelbacher (spelled Worzelbacher on his voter registration!). He was even displayed on the post-debate news spin last night on CBS with Katie Couric. In the phone interview with Joe “McCain is solid … we’ve seen McCain, we know his action.”

Wurzelbacher then expressed concerns about Obama’s tax plan, saying “I’m middle class, I don’t want my taxes raised any more.” When Couric asked him whether he made over $250,000 a year, he replied no, but then called it “a slippery slope” when someone decides $250,000 and you’re rich, then $100,000 a year and your rich.

Wurzelbacher had already met McCain, and per his story saw Obama walking through his neighborhood while he was out, and he walked over to get involved as he “always wanted to ask these guys a question and really corner them.” On Obama’s answers to his questions, old ‘Joe The Plumber’ felt "unfortunately I still got a tap dance ... almost as good as Sammy Davis Jr."

It certainly made for good anecdotal reference. And the post debate interview made great RNC spin.

Yet something there seemed a bit too standard issue FOX News to me.

So after after some digging I found that Joe is indeed a registered Republican. No surprise.

But then I began wondering if old Joe The Plumber communicated this to the McCain campaign? The McCain camp, I’m sure, would see this as a wonderful way to play off Joe as a common connection during the debaters, and someone who was presumed by many (or at least played up to be) to be the quintessential uncommitted or independent voter in this middle American battleground state. Can you say “shill?”

It turns out that Joe’s dad is reported to be a heavy contributor to the GOP. Maybe Joe’s not quite such an independent voice after all. But again no surprise, this is America the polarized.

An unrelated final note, Joe it seems was at least accused of domestic violence by his first wife Jennifer according to papers filed in their divorce in Tucson back in 1997. Part of the court costs included the County’s charges for the Battered Women’s Shelter. http://apps.co.lucas.oh.us/onlinedockets/DocketDR.aspx?STYPE=1&PAR=DR19970476&STARTDATE=01/01/1900&ENDDATE=01/01/2100&PARTY=D,1

Well, Joe’s just a regular guy all right. All the same fallibilities. And even the same pre-conceived allegiances. Nothing special.

I just wish the media would stop playing him off as “something special.”

“I'm kind of like the, uh, Everyman, so I think people just relate to that.” — Kato Kaelin, groundskeeper for O. J. Simpson

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Man Car Review : Sports Activity Coupe by BMW

If driving an SUV has always seemed a little un-sporty, bulky and little un-cool for you, then you don't need to look further anymore now with BMW's Sports Activity Coupe
Well, this new segment of crossover vehicle created by BMW to describe the 2009 X6, which had made its official debut in Detroit. While it's not the best segment name you've ever heard, it still beats the ubiquitous “crossover.”


If you are familiar with BMW's X5, This Sports Activity Coupe is basically an extension of X5, but in a much sleeker package. BMW has clearly sacrificed some of the X5's utility (passenger room and cargo capacity) for the sake of styling, thanks to that sloping roofline.

According to industry news, The X6 will also be available in a hybrid model using the Two-Mode system it developed with GM, Mercedes-Benz and Chrysler, which give you more fuel efficient driving experience.


Technorati Tags: , ,

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

GOP Economic Proposals Will Elongate Depression

John McCain has hinted that he plans to reveal his economic package today in an effort to keep pace and perhaps counterbalance the Barack Obama economic proposal. There’s one thing that struck me as odd, in this era of evaporating jobs and oncoming Depression. The McCain proposal hints at calls for using $300 billion of the $700 billion financial bailout package to keep Americans in their homes, stop declining housing values, and stabilize the financial markets.

Indeed the decline in real estate has devastated the financial markets and they’ve already gotten their bailouts in order to keep the credit markets primed with cash to avoid another freeze-up.

But in an era as we’ve been in the past ten years where, as Ross Perot so bluntly called it, “the great sucking sound” of disappearing jobs has gone from background din to deafening alarm. And McCain has no plan to change that any time soon.

Devaluation of real estate is inevitable. This is a hard pill that America is going to be force-fed, but is nevertheless necessary if we wish to survive in the “flat earth” economy. It’s not the only thing that must devalue in price and cost, but it’s one of the most critical.

As we’ve noticed rather clearly, especially during the George W. Bush era where added tax incentives accelerated the pace, business is in love with cheap labor – the cheaper, the better. It initially started with manufacturing and labor-oriented jobs, but has expanded to accounting, computer programming and even financial and service-industry jobs. Everyone wants a bargain, and no one loves it more than business executives and Wall Street investors. Cheaper costs mean more profit.

One of the primary reasons jobs fly overseas is due to this new awareness of a plethora of cheap labor. Even if it doesn’t produce as Americans would, or end up as good quality as what we may do domestically, the cost differential more than makes up for it. It’s also helped keep what jobs below the executive level that are left in the U.S. more bargain-priced than ever – even in the face of rampant cost-increases in everything.

Yet even with our fixed incomes for most of America, the bottom line is still more attractive by going cheaper and going overseas. We in America cannot compete with that due to our overly high cost of living. While a $9 an hour job in India, Indonesia or China may provide a very attractive standard of living and draw an incented workforce, in America it guarantees the individual will be part of a burgeoning working underclass with shrinking living standards and increased difficulties competing with other countries in this flat-earth economic paradigm.

Housing prices, as with food or utilities are one of those indispensable mandatory costs for the global workforce, no matter which country you live in. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to determine that American real estate is vastly higher than the very countries we now must duel with over diminishing work.

One exacerbating problem during this time of disappearing jobs was that many Americans turned to individual investing – flipping real estate – in the midst of Bush’s “Economic Recovery.” They made a handsome profit, providing cushion for the economic and employment uncertainty for a time. But like all pyramid schemes, it reached its saturation point. In the wake of this, we’ve experienced for some time a pricing over-escalation and a painful correction on real estate based on typical American standards and prices.

But once this reaches what were the pricing norms ten or fifteen years ago, the question begs: will there be jobs sufficient and plentiful enough to renew a housing boom? The answer to that will be no.

Until we in America reach cost levels similar to those of China, India or other third-world countries we are now mandated to compete with for jobs, America will face three choices. Either accept job insecurity (which will go where the wages and wage-earner costs are cheapest), acquiesce to a constant stagflated period where wages will be sub-par to bring us to what we’ve been accustomed to over the past decades, or give up on the globalizing workforce and retain jobs in America with the attendant cost increases. Corporations giving up profit are as likely as crack-heads giving up crack. We will have to look to one of the first two options.

Either American living standards must continue eroding at a shocking pace, or the costs of these living standards must come down accordingly in order to give American workers a chance to compete for jobs.

As things stand, McCain wants to artificially continue propping up real estate prices. This guarantees American jobs with livable American-level wages will never be able to compete with flat-earth, globalized workforces. For American wages to remain the same or deflate, and for jobs to stop evaporating before our eyes, costs must come down. And not just for housing prices, but for all essentials.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Men Lifestyle: Celebratory Drink

Perhaps you can celebrate your Halloween's Night is with some Designer Wine.

To celebrate its 20th anniversary in 2009, Fashion Designer, DKNY has partnered with Domaine Chandon to create a custom DKNY sparkling wine. DKNY distributed 800 special-edition bottles of Napa's Domaine Chandon at Sunday's show in Bryant Park.


The French-owned producer drew from two decades of recipes to blend a cuvée for the clothing line's twentieth anniversary in 2009. In return, DKNY designed the "Twenty Year Cuvée" label, will market totes cut to carry Chandon during the holidays, and will release smaller totes (meant for four mini Chandons) in the spring.


Technorati Tags: , , ,

Sunday, October 12, 2008

McCain & Palin Open Pandora’s Box


All week long we’ve been watching clips of Sarah Palin and John McCain rallies across the country and the raw sentiments from their red-meat crowds. The McCain camp admitted last weekend that the economy was killing their support, so they were going to shift focus and were taking this campaign to personal extremes against Barack Obama. It’s been ugly.

Palin (whose nickname ought to be Dick, as in Cheney) especially personifies this element, being the dyed-in-the-wool religiopolitical neo-con. She spares no moment to take the most partisan and most personal shots and deftly massages her devotees into a self-righteously indignant frenzy. They’re angry at the “socialist turn of the country” and blaming Obama (even though it’s neo-con President George W. Bush’s mess, and both Obama AND their candidate McCain voted for and supported the Wall Street Welfare State Act).

Despite the reality, a sizable amount of this FOX-indoctrinated, Limbaugh & Coulter-fed crowd are openly self-assured that Obama is Muslim, has terrorist tendencies and hates America. Lately we’ve get news clips of their recently-stirred, angry throng, yelling “terrorist,” “treason,” “kill him!” and “off with his head!” – even some racial epithets tossed blithely, whether anti-black or anti-Arab.

“They distort my pro- life positions and smear the reputations of my supporters. Why? Because I don't pander to them, because I don't ascribe to their failed philosophy that money is our message.” — Sen. John McCain, presidential candidate in 2000

With reports making the news, and not favorably for the McCain camp, the Senator apparently sensed things were getting out of hand and tried to reel it in at a McCain rally in Minneapolis. When he responded to one angry Town Hall questioner that he “admired” Sen. Obama’s accomplishments and said even if his opponent won, the country would be in good hands, Sen. John McCain was roundly booed at his own rally! No matter how much he tried to restrain them, his supporters would have none of it!

So now, the dilemma. John McCain has opened Pandora’s box in order to release his red-meat base to involve themselves and bring home the victory as they have in the previous two Bush presidential elections. Now out of the box, the red-meat folks won’t go back. Does McCain now risk alienating the one actively supportive wing of his base?

He’s losing some of his business wing with all the talk about “greedy CEO’s” and “maverick” talk about taking on Big Oil. He’s disenchanting his budget-hawk wing with his vote for the bailout and recently his announcement for government to buy back troubled home mortgages. Will McCain be willing to risk the one remaining base he’s able to stir?

After the last debate and the recent polling numbers, the McCain campaign came out openly stating they wanted to avoid the economy (today’s pressing issue), focus on Obama’s character and make the campaign about him. They wanted the Rovian echo chamber, and to give their base that voice and that forum to scream about their feelings. They’ve got what they wished.

The McCain/Palin crowds are quite exuberant about their anti-Obama, anti-Democrat invective, and feel they’re rightful in their rage of being disadvantaged conservatives! The candidates themselves have been fueling this bonfire of the vanity, particularly Sarah Palin. She’s exactly what McCain and the campaign operatives bargained for: the quintessential Dick Cheney-styled barking dog as foil to the above-the-fray would-be president. Even better, she’s wired in directly to evangelicals and is able to tap into the rage in the red-meat crowd. Unlike McCain himself (who many red-meat types are ambivalent about), Palin inspires this “off with the head,” red-meat element.

It’s this newly-created energy that is suddenly developing a life of its own. The crowds hang on every word of both McCain and Palin. Every utterance of “terrorist” draws cheers, and any mention of the name of either media, or any Democrats (specifically Obama) draw boos, and as McCain found out, any attempt to pull back and paint his opponent as human also draws boos! If these crowds begin hearing things out of McCain that they don’t want to hear, will they begin drowning him out with chants of “USA! USA! USA!”?

These red-meat, base crowds have rediscovered their voice, want to keep it and could end up turning on McCain on election day if he risks trying to close Pandora’s box now. In Republican America’s base, there is only victory, never admit defeat and never stop blasting your opponent. Weakness, admitting fallibility or compromise will never be forgotten or forgiven in red America.

So McCain suddenly finds himself in pause, one hand full of mud ready to sling, and on the other hand memory of his own words about running an honorable campaign and decrying personal-attack politics. The latter choice may be honorable, but it would likely cost him and his party their election.

Where now, Candidate McCain …?

“Political intolerance by any political party is neither a Judeo-Christian nor an American value. The political tactics of division and slander are not our values. They are corrupting influences on religion and politics, and those who practice them in the name of religion or in the name of the Republican Party or in the name of America shame our faith, our party and our country.” — Sen. John McCain, presidential candidate in 2000

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Political Mean Season Pushes The Envelope


[At his 51st birthday party at Keating's in the Bahamas sits John McCain (with the bread-loaves hat) and Charles Keating swigging beer.]

"But now ye also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth.
"Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds." — Paul, Colossians 3:8-9, The Bible, King James version

"Bleeding soul becomes a bitter mind.
He said it happens every time." — Clean My Wounds, Corrosion Of Conformity


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjxzmaXAg9E&eurl=http://www.thepresidentialcandidates.us/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJghQMq49dw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itEucdhf4Us

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41lDY-7G8ps

“Say it ain’t so Joe, there ya go again, pointin’ fingers and lookin’ backwards … we need a campaign that looks forward,” said Sarah Palin channeling her best Ronald Reagan invocation to Joe Biden in the Veep debates just a week ago. It was a good strategy concocted by the campaign handlers: “forget what’s just passed, let’s look forward.”

Well apparently when looking forward doesn’t help, the John McCain Campaign – and even “lookin’ forward” Palin herself – can’t avoid looking backward to trash Barack Obama’s character.

This week has seen Palin “runnin’ around,” trying to pull up associations from Obama’s past – whether Bill Ayers from the 60’s anti-war era Weather Underground, to Rev. Jeremiah Wright (famous for his post 9/11 sermons blasting the U.S. for its sponsorship of nations who practice terror).

The McCain campaign surrogates are also bringing up the “Muslim card” again (regardless of it being a canard) and stirring their know-nothing base indoctrinated on FOX, Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh into a mouth-frothing frenzy. Beyond just calling him Barack Hussein Obama openly, they’re even planting some of their campaign surrogates in the crowd to yell out “terrorist,” “treason,” and “kill him” at timely intervals after a Palin speech soundbite. They’re well aware that the cameras will be rolling, and the coded message will get out to the rest of the crowd (“it’s okay to stand up and speak your mind”) and to the folks watching at home on FOX nightly newscasts (“bring your epithets and vitriol to the next rally near you.”) What’s especially of concern is how this code-wording is touching the minds of the Timothy McVeigh element of conservatives – those who won’t cede power and will use any means necessary to insist on retaining it. Or else!

For now it’s all about trolling down ugly memory lane for Palin and the McCain camp. It’s all they’ve got left in their arsenal at this point.

Meanwhile the drugs must have addled Cindy McCain’s brain. In an interview with the Tennesseean, the “trollop” (as McCain once endearingly poked fun of her at an event years ago) and wannabe first-lady said the Obama campaign had run the “dirtiest campaign in American history”! Talk about audacity!

Somehow or another, Ms. McCain feels this race has been more hurtful than the 2000 presidential primary race, where George W. Bush's campaign called their adopted Bangladeshi daughter “John McCain’s love child from an interracial affair.” Bush & Rove operatives also did push-polling, indicating that McCain gave a statement while at the Hanoi Hilton “apologizing” for the U.S. aggression in Vietnam a la Jane Fonda. They also brought out one of John McCain’s fellow servicemen who pointed out McCain had ditched fellow POW’s and MIA’s by opposing any search for service members who were still not accounted for nor returned to the U.S. Apparently all these things have slipped Ms. McCain’s memory.

Yes, drugs will do that sometimes, and we’re aware of Cindy’s addiction history (thanks to a Republican who blew the whistle on her when she used his name on some of her counterfeit prescriptions).

So far, the Obama campaign has avoided all of those subjects above, brought forth not by Democrats, but by Republicans. Apparently those subjects are fair game to Cindy McCain and Karl Rove and that ilk; relevant subjects which they feel are the pressing issue of the day for American voters.

Meanwhile, America’s economic meltdown rages, thanks to our crisis of Wall Street Bank failures. So in response to the negative, looking-back-into-past-relationships campaign strategy of McCain, Obama has engaged in a little tit-for-tat, pointing out one of John McCain’s friendships.

Charles Keating was the chief of Lincoln Savings & Loan during the Oil Bust, Savings & Loan meltdown that caused our first devastating home foreclosure wipe-out in the late 80’s. Charles Keating was also a close friend to John McCain, and was blessed with the senator’s assistance in 1987 in holding off regulators investigating their shady practices. While McCain ran interference, the bank tanked to the tune of $2 billion in 1989, while the bank’s bondholders and their elderly investors lost their entire investments.

For his support to his good friend, John McCain raked in $112,000 in campaign contributions, not to mention trips on Keating’s private jets. Even Cindy McCain and her father Jim Hensley had invested over $350,000 in one of Keating’s retail projects, so it was more than just a casual acquaintance. John Keating himself became the poster child of mismanagement of the Savings & Loans crisis cum Resolution Trust Corporation fire sale in the early 90's.

John McCain doesn't get it. The nation’s number one concern right now is our financial future, and Obama's former friends are only a passing concern at best to those watching their retirements disappear.

As America is reeling due to “Economic Recovery,” plunging global stock markets, bank failures and FDIC solvency concerns, the only one of these “looking-backwards” guilt-by-association, question-the-judgment games that is even relevant at this disastrous moment is the one about the cozy friendship with a sleazy banker.

Guess who has that history? Not Obama! It’s the “other” one!

“When life is too easy for us, we must beware or we may not be ready to meet the blows which sooner or later come to everyone, rich or poor.” — Eleanor Roosevelt

Men Fashion Designer: Tom Ford's Dream Come True

I am sure everyone know Tom Ford. Come on, just do a simple googling, you should get tons of Tom Ford bio if you don't really know him.

After this fashion designer left Gucci in 2004, he spoke publicly about wanting to get into directing. After so many years, he is finally going to see his dream come true.


The former Gucci fashion designer is putting the final touches on his directorial debut of the movie adaptation of Christopher Isherwood’s 1964 novel, A Single Man.


Sources revealed that it looks like Colin Firth will star as a gay college professor who deals with the sudden death of his lover. The character is helped in his efforts by a lifelong female friend and one of his students.

Firth’s rep reported that "he’s in discussions" but it’s not a done deal.

Julianne Moore will play the friend while Jamie Bell has signed for the student role. The story takes place in 1962 in Los Angeles.

No studio is attached to the project, but Ford plans to begin filming in L.A. in November.

Source: uk.eonline.com

Technorati Tags: , ,

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Presidential Debate II: The Tipping Point


"Girls were girls and men were men.
Mister we could use a man like Herbert Hoover again.
Didn't need no welfare states.
Everybody pulled his weight.
Gee, our old LaSalle ran great.
Those were the days!" — Those Were The Days (Theme From All In The Family), Carroll O'Connor & Jean Stapleton


"It takes skill to be real, time to heal each other
And although it seems heaven sent
We ain't ready, to see a black President...." — Changes, Tupac Shakur


Unless I’m mistaken or if something really catastrophic occurs between now and election day, I believe we may have just seen the tipping point with last night’s debate. At one point, I felt like I was watching a caricature performance between Don Rickles’ Mr. Warmth and Lionel Jefferson of All In The Family.

Even though this was the so-desired “town hall” format that John McCain had been begging for throughout this campaign, this was not McCain’s night and really undistinguishable from his last debate performance. His body language was robotic and forced unless he was sitting on the stool, at which point he had an unusual, almost-feminine posture (which was a little unnerving). Most of the latter part of the evening he didn't sit much, seeming uncomfortable or maybe nervous.

Contrast this to Barack Obama's posture which was more relaxed but attentive, legs akimbo, almost resembling one of the early-60's Kingston Trio sitting on the stool (I don't know why I got that visual). He was his usual unflappable self, and it became clear that even though this was McCain’s element, Obama was beating him on his home court.
For his part, McCain stalked around the forum floor in a stiff awkward fashion, tossing out barely-veiled insults in wisecrack fashion, replete with feintly audible septuagenarian grunts and breathing. His movements, his speech and even his appearance resembled Don Rickles walking the stage in his HBO special Mr. Warmth. It’s the type of thing you expect when you plop down $25 for a ticket to sit and watch epithet-laden comedy with a top-notch comic. McCain’s humor (if that’s what it was) just didn’t come close to matching Rickles’ timing, much less his joke material.

McCain was the only one chuckling at his too-subtle witticisms. It was the caustic tongue of Rickles without the humor, rather hard to watch.

Obama meanwhile was on point throughout most of the debate, with a few lapses into generalities. As for substance, it was a hands-down win for Obama. He was thoughtful and specific on responses and plans to address the issues brought up in question. He sat smiling through the entire evening, listening (or at least appearing to listen) intently a la Lionel Jefferson to McCain playing Rickles portraying the Archie Bunker role. Unlike the last debate though, this version of “Lionel” Obama had more of an edge and sparred with “Archie” McCain. In the end though, he was still abundantly patient and polite, complete with the headshakes and incredulous smiles with a few smirks as well.

McCain had very little in specifics, sticking mostly to his campaign talking points. While his town hall format didn’t fit his desire to come out swinging on character issues by association, he still took every instance he could to take swipes at Obama’s judgment and inexperience. McCain’s performance even seemed a bit contrived. If anything, for the man who accused Obama of not knowing the difference between tactics and strategy, McCain didn’t appear to have much thought given to strategy.

At one point, when moderator Tom Brokaw asked McCain if he was in favor of Manhattan Project styled approach to new energy technology, McCain gave a one sentence response to it and then launched into defense on Obama’s charges that McCain didn’t support legislation for new technology development. To prove it, he pointed out a billion-dollar bill for Big Oil urged by Bush and Cheney that McCain himself voted against (way to play to your base, Mac!) but for which “That one” – pointing to Obama – voted in favor.

Media and viewers seized upon “That one” across the country – a very objectifying move on McCain’s part. It was a too-sublime attempt at humor that came off very dismissive instead.

The tipping point came nearer the end of the debate when the issue turned to foreign relations, specifically Pakistan. Again McCain ridiculed Obama’s mention of crossing into Pakistan if actionable intelligence had pinpointed Bin Laden, and compared his plan to Teddy Roosevelt’s “walk softly [sic] … but carry a big stick.”

Obama pushed for opportunity to respond to McCain and again explained his position on going into Afghanistan, then added, “Sen. McCain suggests that somehow, you know, I'm green behind the ears and, you know, I'm just spouting off, and he's somber and responsible,” to which a smug McCain smiled broadly and replied “thank you very much!”

Then Obama made a masterful play, noting of McCain: “this is the guy who sang, "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran," who called for the annihilation of North Korea. That, I don't think is an example of "speaking softly." This is the person who, after we had – we hadn't even finished Afghanistan, where he said, "Next up, Baghdad."

McCain’s smile fell off immediately, and he glared straight ahead. He walked right into that trap and got shot with his own weaponry. Check and mate! McCain’s attempt to address Obama ended up in a stuttering, diffuse attempt at explaining himself and explaining away his gaffe – “I was joking with a veteran” – and ended up with an almost pleading repetitions of “I’ll act responsibly” and “I’ll get Bin Laden”.

In a sense it was sad to see what he’s devolved into. Yet after all of his initial promises of “running a respectable campaign” and then later rescinding it since “Obama wouldn’t meet as he promised in a town hall format,” now that Obama was meeting with him in a town hall format it was the same old ugly, combative McCain – no change. And he wasn't even an effective combatant. Obama deuced him on his own game, and McCain was helpless.

Worse still, even with the economy plummeting like a boulder over Yosemite Falls, John McCain once again failed to mention the middle class, the working class or the poor even once. He's now just playing to save his base and his base isn't big enough to get him into the White House.

We’ve now come to the point where it’s truly Obama’s game to lose. Seeing how he’s played to date, he won’t! Now we need to ensure he has all the down-ballot support in Congress that he's going to need instead of the obstructionist Republicans!

"High time we made a stand and shook up the views of the common man,
And the lovetrain rides from coast to coast.
D.J's the man we love the most.
Could you be, could you be squeaky clean
And smash any hope of democracy?
As the headline says you're free to choose
Theres egg on your face and mud on your shoes." — Sowing The Seeds Of Love, Tears For Fears